|
On Wednesday night in Glasgow, Melanie Woods crossed the line first in the T54 1500m at the Commonwealth Games with a record-breaking time of 3:33.39. Home crowd. Except it wasn't. A collision on the opening bend had taken down four of the finalists. Two never finished. The appeals came in, and by the next day the jury had voided the result entirely. The race Woods had won — the one with her name on the record board — no longer existed. She would have to do it all over again Friday morning. Can you even imagine? You race the race of your life, only to be told that not only does it not count, you may have totally exhausted yourself before having to do it again. The thing you trained for. But again Melanie did. Less than 40 hours later, she went back to the track. Oh, and then she went and won the 400m the next day, just for good measure. We want to file this under resilience. Or injustice. Or grace under pressure. Fine. But I think that misses it the magic. I wrote in Wonderhell that there isn't one big finish line, but a million different little ones. This is what that looks like with a stopwatch on it. You hit the number, and the reward is a new number. You land the client, and the reward is a bigger client. You get the promotion you spent three years chasing, and by Tuesday morning someone is asking what you're going to do with it. Nobody frames it as brutally as a voided result and a 10:24am start time. But that's the shape of it, even for us mere mortals. So, here's what I'm taking away from immortal Melanie: she went... faster. Not out of anger, not out of spite, but because she saw a glimpse of what she was capable of. They could take the medal. That first race had told her something true about herself, and that was the only thing she needed to carry into the second one. Because the thing I know to be true this week is this: yesterday's ceiling is just tomorrow's floor. At the end of the games, Melanie was awarded the David Dixon Award for the Outstanding Athlete of the Games. It's an award judged by her peers, and it weighs sporting performance, fair play, and contribution to her team. And, I believe it wasn't earned with how she raced the 3:32:20, but for how she managed to balance the weight of ambition in the 40 hours in between the first race and the second. Do You Spot Talent for a Living?If you work in Human Resources talent management, or executive recruiting I want to talk to you about the role of intuition in hiring decision-making for my doctoral dissertation research. If that's you, or you know who that is, reply and I'll send details. |